<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty: Risking Nuclear Uncertainty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infiniteinjury.org/blog/2005/11/05/the-comprehensive-test-ban-treaty-risking-nuclear-uncertainty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infiniteinjury.org/blog/2005/11/05/the-comprehensive-test-ban-treaty-risking-nuclear-uncertainty/</link>
	<description>Good Analysis, Bad Grammar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TruePath</title>
		<link>http://www.infiniteinjury.org/blog/2005/11/05/the-comprehensive-test-ban-treaty-risking-nuclear-uncertainty/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>TruePath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infiniteinjury.org/blog/2005/11/5/the-comprehensive-test-ban-treaty-risking-nuclear-uncertainty/#comment-868</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure I understand your objection.  The question is whether it is indeed a measure that makes war less likely.  If in fact it makes war more likely than it shouldn&#039;t be supported just because it seems warm and fuzzy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I understand your objection.  The question is whether it is indeed a measure that makes war less likely.  If in fact it makes war more likely than it shouldn&#8217;t be supported just because it seems warm and fuzzy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GNZ</title>
		<link>http://www.infiniteinjury.org/blog/2005/11/05/the-comprehensive-test-ban-treaty-risking-nuclear-uncertainty/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>GNZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infiniteinjury.org/blog/2005/11/5/the-comprehensive-test-ban-treaty-risking-nuclear-uncertainty/#comment-862</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not entirely convinced - it looks to have a very minimal direct effect in exchange for a chance of a reduction in the catastrophe. those two might be a wash. But this is also about a general meme of not just &#039;anti nuclear&quot; but anti war sentiment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My general opinion is that the sucess or failure of CTBT is not all that important although I will offer a little bit of polite clapping for those against war or those who are giving concessions to that movement for big picture reasons.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But you are of course right that more trained minds than mine should be looking at the game-theoretic concerns and producing papers on it. I can also accept that decisions that sound smart at face value to a layman may be unbelievably stupid.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The next step to that would be that the general public should be reading them and paying attention... fat chance of that happening.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not entirely convinced &#8211; it looks to have a very minimal direct effect in exchange for a chance of a reduction in the catastrophe. those two might be a wash. But this is also about a general meme of not just &#8216;anti nuclear&#8221; but anti war sentiment.</p>
<p>My general opinion is that the sucess or failure of CTBT is not all that important although I will offer a little bit of polite clapping for those against war or those who are giving concessions to that movement for big picture reasons.</p>
<p>But you are of course right that more trained minds than mine should be looking at the game-theoretic concerns and producing papers on it. I can also accept that decisions that sound smart at face value to a layman may be unbelievably stupid.</p>
<p>The next step to that would be that the general public should be reading them and paying attention&#8230; fat chance of that happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

